Process reconstruction
Map the source recipe, materials, parameters, sampling, yields, equipment, controls, holds and release logic to the receiving site.
MSAT process modelling tools
Turn tech transfer, facility fit and manufacturing evidence into one controlled model.
Acatian gives MSAT teams a shared engineering basis for process reconstruction, site comparison, equipment constraints, batch data, deviations, scheduling, continued verification, scenario review and technical handover.
Site constraints
Compare geometry, working volume, mass transfer, heat, room grade, utilities, automation, transfer paths, cleaning and shared assets.
Capacity and variability
Reconcile batch data, campaign schedule, queues, WIP, labor, maintenance, utility peaks, deviations and achievable annual throughput.
Validation and change
Keep source ownership, maturity, branches, versions, approvals, before-and-after impact and limitations beside the calculation.
MSAT workflow
Start from the manufacturing decision, not from another disconnected spreadsheet.
Define whether the model supports transfer, scale change, deviation investigation, capacity, process characterization, cost reduction or continued process verification. Each context needs its own outputs, acceptance criteria and data authority.Data intake
Ingest authorized batch records, historian tags, assays, recipes, equipment data, calibration status, deviations and schedule history with units, timestamps, batch context, transformations and reviewer. Preserve raw files separately from mapped model values and flag missing, stale or contradictory evidence.
Engineering reconciliation
Close component balances, compare dynamic trajectories, verify equipment duty and controls, quantify process and site differences, calculate shared-resource occupancy and expose assumptions that cannot be transferred directly. Review scale-dependent parameters before using source-site values at the receiving scale.
Controlled decision record
Publish the selected scenario, alternatives, sensitivities, active limits, unresolved risks, data gaps and validation status together with an immutable run and export manifest. Use roles, versions and approvals to support review; retain the qualified quality system as the authoritative regulated record.
DecisionDeliverableAcceptance evidence
Technology transferSource-to-target difference register and receiving-site modelAuthorized recipe, equipment mapping, engineering runs and transfer criteria
Facility fitEquipment, room, utility, schedule and hold-time assessmentSite data, layouts, equipment limits and approved operating calendars
Continued verificationAligned trends, model residuals, alerts and review worklistGoverned historian and assay data, data-quality rules and approved response