Independent model study · integrated chemicals

Optimise cracker feed only after the full co-product network closes

Choose the naphtha/butane ratio against ethylene, propylene, C4, pygas and fuel-gas demand while steam, storage and downstream outages remain visible.
Optimise cracker feed only after the full co-product network closes in the Acatian flowsheet workspace
One flowsheet connects assumptions, balances, equipment, time, economics and evidence.
BlendCrackQuenchCompressSeparateStoreVerbund sinks

Decision model

A bounded question with a complete plant consequence.

Decision

Select feed ratio and production plan under furnace, separation, steam, product-storage and downstream-demand constraints.

System boundary

Naphtha/butane receipt through cracking abstraction, quench, compression, separation, product tanks, fuel/steam network and downstream demand sinks.

Governing structure

Equations and accounting rules

01Elemental and total mass balance
02Feed-dependent product yield matrix
03Furnace duty and steam generation/consumption
04Time-indexed product inventory and downstream demand
Scenario set

Base, alternative and stress cases

  • Naphtha-heavy versus butane-heavy
  • Propylene-demand spike
  • Downstream outage and constrained steam
  • Co-product price collapse

Engineering brief

Model the complete decision, not an isolated unit operation.

BASF publicly describes a flex-feed cracker able to use naphtha and butane and the Verbund principle of integrated by-product and energy flows.

The public evidence supports the architecture, not proprietary yields, furnace settings, economics or downstream nominations. The model is not a Zhanjiang digital twin.

01 · Model basis

What the Acatian model needs to resolve

Inputs, mechanisms, limits and outputs remain reviewable on one declared basis.

Inputs

Data

Feed assays, prices and availability

Evidence

Public/literature yield matrix by feed and severity

Plant

Furnace, compressor and separation capacities

Basis

Product demand, storage, steam and maintenance calendars

Mechanisms

Balance

Elemental and total mass balance

Model

Feed-dependent product yield matrix

System

Furnace duty and steam generation/consumption

Time

Time-indexed product inventory and downstream demand

Constraints

Limit

Furnace and compression capacity

Risk

Steam headers and energy integration

Capacity

Product storage and minimum rates

Gate

Downstream outages and co-product demand

Outputs

Result

Ethylene, propylene and co-product tonnes

Decision

Feed and energy intensity

Plant

Steam balance and inventory peaks

Value

Margin, carbon proxy and binding capacity

02 · Acatian workflow

Build it in six controlled steps

Each step creates a reviewable object, not a hidden spreadsheet assumption.
  1. 01

    Declare feed and demand basis.

  2. 02

    Close elemental and yield-matrix balances.

  3. 03

    Add furnace, compression and separation duties.

  4. 04

    Connect steam, fuel and product inventories.

  5. 05

    Schedule demand, outages and minimum rates.

  6. 06

    Compare margin, energy and carbon outcomes.

03 · Decisions

Questions the model should answer

Which feed ratio fits the demand slate?

Where does a co-product accumulate?

Does steam or separation bind?

How does an outage change the optimum?

04 · Evidence boundary

Validate before the result carries weight

Validation

Verify yield-matrix provenance, C/H closure, energy balance, inventory and demand reconciliation against authorised plant or licensor data.

Limitations

No BASF cracker yield, severity, margin or plant configuration is disclosed. Detailed furnace, metallurgy, safety and licensor design are outside scope.

Public evidence

What the company context supports—and what it does not.

Sources establish the public process architecture. They do not reveal private operating parameters, site performance or an Acatian relationship.
  1. BASF — Verbund factbookPublic integrated value-chain and by-product context.
  2. BASF — Investments and portfolioPublic naphtha/butane flex-feed context.

Frequently asked questions

Practical modelling questions

Is this the named organisation's real plant model?

No. It is an independent hypothetical Acatian study based only on the cited public process architecture. It claims no affiliation, endorsement, deployment, confidential data or actual plant performance.

Where do the numerical inputs come from?

Every input must be marked as a public fact, literature estimate, transparent engineering assumption or authorised customer input. The public article does not invent private operating values.

Can the model be calibrated to a real facility?

Yes, when the operator supplies authorised process, equipment, schedule and utility evidence and agrees the intended use, acceptance criteria and validation plan.

Related engineering guides

Continue through the connected model.

Bring one real process question

Build a model your technical team can inspect, challenge and improve.

Start with customer-owned data, explicit acceptance criteria and a clearly bounded engineering decision.